Skip to main content

Milk - Raw vs Pasteurized which is better


During the early 20th century, Foodborne illness became a bigger issue. Milk as we know is a perfect meal, but at the same time milk is highly perishable item and due to this it caters a perfect environment for the growth of the microbes.
Due to Industrialization and urbanisation more and more people moved towards the cities, moving away from the source of the food; thus, it become more important to preserve milk and food commodities in general.
In context of this preservation techniques were made, one such technique is PASTEURISATION. Pasteurisation was developed to preserve the beverages in general and this technique is widely used to preserve the milk.
This however has led to debates among the masses whether to consume treated milk or not. I personally belong to the group of masses that promotes the consumption of treated milk and I highly recommend drinking only pasteurised milk.

A simple click on the browser and one can see number of articles and blogs explaining how pasteurisation degrades the quality of the milk, but none of the claims made in the blogs or articles are backed by enough science, findings and experiment.
In this writing I have tried to Shatter some of the popular beliefs by those who promote the consumption of raw milk.
RAW OR HEATED MILK a study published in Food control journal, gives the nutritional components present in raw milk and pasteurised milk. It can be seen from the table 1
That there is no change in the macronutrients (proteins, carbohydrates and fats) but however the micronutrient (vitamin B6, folic acid, ascorbic acid) are reduced a small fraction. A fraction so small so be taken into consideration the only compound lost in pasteurisation is vitamin C but milk is not a good source of the above said vitamin.
The table and the study shows that the claims made by those promotion the benefits of raw milk over pasteurised milk can be refuted.
The only changes occurring in milk pasteurisation are sensory  colour and taste.


Table 1 showing the composition of Raw Milk and Pasteurised Milk (UHT and HTST). Taken from the study ‘RAW OR HEATED MILK OF COW’.

Second claim by the masses supporting the consumption of raw milk is that due to pasteurisation taste and flavour components of the mil are lost and thus the raw milk is tastier, but frankly taste is subjective and in order to make people consume raw milk  intentionally just to compare its taste with pasteurised milk would be ethically wrong thus this claim is not backed by enough science . In my opinion and this is a personal opinion the taste difference is due to homogenisation, as the raw milk has bigger globules of fat and this contributes to richer and fuller taste.

The third and one of the most popular debateable claims made by those who use raw milk is that raw milk has a decent titter of probiotics and believes that this makes the milk healthier. In the consumer survey the raw milk drinkers often cites ‘Good bacteria’ or ‘Probiotic’ as the most important factor to choose the raw milk. The WHO definition for probiotic is ‘LIVING MOCROBES WHEN ADMINISTERD IN ADEQUATE AMOUNT CONFER A HEALTH BENEFIT ON THE HOST.’[] the producers always promote raw milk as a good source of probiotic, but however there are no studies showing that claims meet the requirements. In fact the milk from a health mammal is sterile when it leaves the mammary gland, so a good quality (grade A) raw milk handled with proper sanitization and production using the hygienic technology should have hardly any microbes. However when the milk passes through the skin or teat it may pick up some microbes, still not enough to be called PROBIOTICS.


Popular posts from this blog


 WHITE RICE VS BROWN RICE - WHICH IS BETTER? Ending the long Debate – By Dev. I still recall the Cadbury advertisement from when I was between the ages of 13 and 14, which warned: "Waste waste waste" if you don't add Bournvita to your milk, the calcium in the milk will be lost. Vitamin D being a precursor for the absorption of Calcium. The Advertisement claimed that their product helps in better absorption of calcium as their product is fortified with vitamin D.      An average person gets enough vitamin D from sunlight and home-cooked food. The majority of commercially available milk is also fortified with vitamin D before being put on the market. Following a lawsuit against Cadbury, the advertisement had to be taken down. This is a common application of the scare strategy. Marketers frequently employ scare tactics like this to persuade consumers to purchase one product over another. I frequently encounter the question, " White rice or brown rice, which is better ,&

A Death Pin in your Brew

Ontario has just witnessed its first flurry and I was out in the  morning , chilly winds blowing through my hair with a cup of Chai tea in my hand and the words , ` There is something in the nature of tea that leads us into a world of quiet contemplation of life.’ - by   Lin Yutang   made so much  sense  .  It is the second most consumed drink , second only to the  water. Health benefits of tea have been highlighted in manuscripts , for years it was believed  that it caused a placebo effect-but as the modern day science unraveled tea , it has provided a basis for this belief.  Tea has been cultivated for years around the world not merely for its taste but also for  medicinal properties and every research published in scientific literature provides a stronger  evidence for these claims.  Tea is loaded with antioxidants and polyphenolic compounds ( catechins and theaflavins) that provide most if not all the health benefits . They have been shown to be beneficial in cardiovascular disease

Food Allergies.

  Hey my People, I recently got the opportunity to work in a food biotech lab with allergens , and while doing so  I found myself stumbled upon this horrific thought. What if I could Die from a Kiss? Well for most of us this sounds far fetched from reality but if you are allergic to Peanuts and you kissed your partner who had peanuts right before kissing you, light out for you my friend.  Food Allergies have been around for Decades, people have been suffering from them from time unknown. Just like it's origin , it’s mechanism is also unknown.  Researches   and studies show that certain proteins trigger the reaction, but in order to learn about allergies let’s dig a little deeper. Food allergies are usually caused by the big 8 (90% cases) :- Milk Eggs Peanuts  Tree nuts Fish Shellfish  Wheat  Soy but are not limited to these food products. Peanut allergy is the most common allergy in the US affecting 1 in 40 children. Who knew that a harmless looking peanut butter jar c